The Great Foot Debate (c60): Difference between revisions
imported>TemrielDelta No edit summary |
m (image fix) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[File:Sanadebate. | [[File:Sanadebate.png|thumb|Source image used in the de-fiddle of the artwork.]] | ||
During [[Canvas 60]], [[Gura's Supermarket]] was having a vote on if a foot should be kept in a particular art work they were working on which sparked a debate in the faction's Discord server whether it should be kept or not. This also lead to Pxls users offering to place pixels for [[Gura's Supermarket|GSm]] in exchange for the foot being kept, or for it to not be kept. | During [[Canvas 60]], [[Gura's Supermarket]] was having a vote on if a foot should be kept in a particular art work they were working on which sparked a debate in the faction's Discord server whether it should be kept or not. This also lead to Pxls users offering to place pixels for [[Gura's Supermarket|GSm]] in exchange for the foot being kept, or for it to not be kept. | ||
Revision as of 05:46, 17 September 2023
During Canvas 60, Gura's Supermarket was having a vote on if a foot should be kept in a particular art work they were working on which sparked a debate in the faction's Discord server whether it should be kept or not. This also lead to Pxls users offering to place pixels for GSm in exchange for the foot being kept, or for it to not be kept.
However, in the end, 24 hours after the initial vote was announced, the anti-foot side won, and the foot would be removed in the next artwork update.
Pushback
After the final decision was made, a group of around 5 people started to build and protect the foot despite the inconsistency with the vote held, and due to gaudi999 never updating the template to put something else there afterwards.
However after a few weeks afterwards nearing reset, the vote of the status of the foot was finally enforced and it would be removed in a quick and deceive manner, being replaced by space background after having been on canvas for weeks at that point.